

Most of the people repeating the keywords “male loneliness epidemic” are, but that doesn’t mean you automatically are. You’re probably suffering from the same loneliness people of all genders are.
:3
Most of the people repeating the keywords “male loneliness epidemic” are, but that doesn’t mean you automatically are. You’re probably suffering from the same loneliness people of all genders are.
It’s probably in the context of business listings
gex without dominating? 🥺
Long bacon when girl :D
Maybe I’m too autistic, but I feel like I’d be more inclined to buy a product if they actually just told me what it’s used for and why their product is better (but in non wishy-washy terms).
Don’t they already have to switch between assets to fit in lower-end sized VRAM?
I also see many people treating dating as like an exam, where if you “fail” that’s your fault, rather than this particular pairing of people just not working out. Pickup “artists” are the worst about this.
And like, why would you even want to force a relationship to happen if you two don’t match well? That’s gonna be bad for everyone involved… unless… it’s not about a personal relationship at all, and perhaps it’s about having a commodity in your possession…
It was a Linux ISO
“turns the Windows computers gay” also known as installing Linux
DEI or die in action again.
It’s gay. Proof left as an exercise to the reader.
Gay nerd reporting for duty!
Why not? Gatekeeping personal stuff is, as a general rule, bad. So you do what you want, and that’s awesome <3
It’s crazy that we can teleport heat directly into the metal of the cookware
I can’t speak for the person you were responding to, but I would do that as a first-hand demonstration of the flaws of their thinking. I could just say “you’re wrong and here’s why”, but I think it’s a lot more persuasive if I get them to go down that path and figure it out themselves.
I’m sure you could come up with a self consistent definition, but who says it would be “correct” (whatever that means)? If I define chair as an atom with 1 proton in the nucleus, that’s a pretty clear definition with little room for edge cases, but it’s also completely absurd.
You could also define “woman” by listing out everyone you feel counts as a woman, and that would technically be self consistent, but again, that’d be absurd. It’s all completely arbitrary, so why should I or anyone else care about that definition? Same goes for any hypothetical 20 page definition.
My driver’s license says “Sex: Yes please”
tbh I don’t think most babies intend for anything the moment they’re born
“It’s complicated” is probably better for doctors and scientists. The other day I was filling out a “women only” medical form and about half of the questions were relevant to me.
And for a scientist, what exactly are they studying? For social science or psychology I’m an outlier no matter which gender or sex box you put me in; for reproductive stuff I’m closer to male but still somewhat of an outlier (because hormones); for various other medical things I’m closer to female (hormones again); neurologically idk, but there’s evidence trans people tend to not match their AGAB here.
But yeah, normal people shouldn’t care about any of that when just talking to me.
Xenia!