Ⓐ☮☭

  • 5 Posts
  • 262 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 20th, 2023

help-circle
  • AlterEgoTest@sopuli.xyztomemes@lemmy.worldAsparagus
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    I would not recommend for people to casually start trimming plantlife in the wild. /s

    Unironically though there might be lots of insects living within that ecosystem that rely on it. If you don’t need something for a dish or specific resource, just leave it alone.




  • The textbook:

    “After the likeness of [this] angel. He made the incorruptible [generation] of Seth appear to the 12 androgynous [luminaries. And then] he made 72 luminaries appear in the incorruptible generation according to the Spirit’s will. Then the 72 luminaries themselves made 360 luminaries appear in the incorruptible generation according to the Spirit’s will so that there’d be 5 for each. And the 12 realms of the 12 luminaries make up their father, with 6 heavens for each realm so there are 72 heavens for the 72 luminaries, and for each 1 [of them 5] firmaments [for a total of] 360 [firmaments. They] were given authority and a [great] army of angels without number for honor and service, along with virgin spirits [too] for the honor and [service] of all the realms and the heavens with their firmaments.”






  • AlterEgoTest@sopuli.xyztomemes@lemmy.worldAI revolution
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    56
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    I dont want to pick a fight but i hope people who upvote this while believing everything ai is bad reflect on the fact that this meme was made using ai.

    My point is ai is often used in bad ways but not automatically and pointing out proper use exists gets people angry.





  • This is correct.

    This is a flaw i had considered and never found a solution for. Hence the idea is unfinished.

    The only further argument i have is that manipulating camera techniques is as old as film yet it’s the digital tools that are causing the most harm and allow any troll to partake. Staging a scene takes at least some dedication and effort.

    If such would be considered on the blockchain than it would also bring in questions all other footage by the same recorder device. “Wallets” from established authors, anonymous or not would have their own reputations of trustworthyness.


  • Not at all. I consider journalists the best potential of early adapter.

    As a consumer i don’t care if i have to copy or screenshot or need to list sources if i am Just sharing to friends.

    Publishers however have a responsibility towards the public to provide fair information. And if i post publicly i also try to pay a bit more attention. (Ignoring i failed exactly that just earlier today)

    There would be nothing stopping anyone to ignore the system and keep sharing unverified pixels but its a real flex be able to provide open and transparent information about your sources almost upfront.

    If enough established organisation start doing this then the ones that don’t will stick out like they have something to hide.

    The exposé is an interesting example I had not yet considered but again i think nothing is stopping publishers from publicly stating they cannot provide sources but have the means to get it independently verified.

    I also believe its possible for a camera/recorded to exist anonymously on the blockchain, just like you don’t know the owner of a crypto wallet.


  • It would but it would be much easier to find/link and compare with the actual original.

    Of course i have mentioned this was never a complete finished idea, just some thoughts i had for years.

    Nowadays i can conceptualise ai tools that detect near duplicates but those obviously were not a thing when i first came up with this.

    I would hope that it would be considered very damning if an official publishers referred to false footage while having all the tools to find and refer to the original. So would it Be damning for the uploader and all footage recorded with their device.



  • Did you reply to the wrong comment?

    The problem is “misinformation” and has been since before nft/genai became a thing.

    Gen Ai makes misinformation worse but the event that sparked this was a gop shared video of a democrat which was slightly speed up to seem more aggressive.

    Also simple framing to cut off context from the original has been a very common form of misinformation for decades.




  • Those would probably be a part of it.

    Comparing a hashcode implies you have a verifiable source for the original footage.

    You can do this manually and dig for the author but thats not always that simple.

    A second step would be to build In a reference to the record in each media file, expressed as a small clickable logo.

    You grandma deserves to be capable to verify.







OSZAR »