Forming hypotheses and testing them has led to a firm belief that I’m definitely a bottom scientist. uwu
Forming hypotheses and testing them has led to a firm belief that I’m definitely a bottom scientist. uwu
What the hell are youwu doing here?
:3
I’m sorry, did I miss a mass disarmament event? It may not be as novel as it used to be, but the dull threat of nuclear war has been a constant backdrop in our lives.
Yep. Either that, or you’re just exhausted but also caffeinated so can’t sleep, and then you can’t focus all day, and end up being unproductive.
Hopefully it’s for a flight or something, and you’re a good airplane sleeper.
I foresee copious amounts of caffeine in your near future.
Sometimes a goose 'as gotta do what a goose 'as gotta do.
deleted by creator
Don’t forget the line spacing. That was always my first go to if I needed a page more or less.
Yay! *hugs*
Is it the upvote button? I’ll be expecting my cute clingy, bitey femboy post haste.
It’s a tubear that grows and sells chives.
The spirit is willing, but the flesh is spongy and bruised.
That’s honestly probably the play.
There is a kinda kludge of a workaround with a plugin, but then there’s no way to get plugins to auto-load whenever a video is first loaded, so you still have to go through the menus to create “automatic” folder playlist. And that’s nearly the same amount of friction as making a playlist.
Ugh. As much as I like vlc, I have to agree. Mini rant time.
It absolutely boggles my mind that the vlc devs refuse to implement automatic loading of prev/next tracks in the same folder, a basic feature that pretty much every other major player has, because it’s not their intended use pattern.
This is a convenience feature to save the user selecting tracks and making a playlist every time they want to watch a few sequential videos (i.e. episodes) in a row.
While I do think it’s unreasonable to ask devs to implement a feature in their own software that they don’t want, it’s also bull-headed decisions like that that hold back mainstream adoption.
Technically not wrong. That’s a nice looking 0.003Ω resistor.