I regular post on [email protected], I made that mistake a few times

there anything I can do to guard against that issue in the future? Is there a way to mirror an account between two instances or something?

Open an alt, export/import your settings

Cool to see you back!

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/45900905

It’s alright https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/45977837

I still wouldn’t mind 100k monthly active users, or even 75k.

That should mean one additional active poster on all the community where I’m alone, and that would be cool

You’re doing great!

https://chachara.club/ is quite new, let’s see how it goes

Well, thankfully most of the communities migrations have been handled

I wanted to post mine, but just cleared it yesterday

Community migration is possible on Piefed https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/45876492?scrollToComments=true

Community migration is possible on Piefed https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/45876492?scrollToComments=true

Those users are probably going to go to feddit.uk?

Our findings show that the abuse rate for the .zip TLD is 0.20% which is close to the average compared to all other TLDs. This rate indicates that .zip domain names are not being used to attack users more than the average TLDs - at least for now. However, if attackers find they have better success using .zip than other TLDs, the rates of abuse might change.

Given new TLDs, such as .zip, tend to have a higher abuse rate than legacy and ccTLDs we suggest that the security research community should continue the healthy debate about the potential risks of the .zip TLD and that internet users continue to be weary of downloading and opening files with a .zip extension or TLD from sources or individuals they may not know.

https://dnsrf.org/blog/the--zip-tld---ripe-for-abuse--but-so-far-so-good-/index.html

Choosing to use this TLD basically just screams ignorance, and should be causing users to question the competence of the person who made that choice.

Not sure if that tone is the best for a healthy debate.

Our findings show that the abuse rate for the .zip TLD is 0.20% which is close to the average compared to all other TLDs. This rate indicates that .zip domain names are not being used to attack users more than the average TLDs - at least for now. However, if attackers find they have better success using .zip than other TLDs, the rates of abuse might change.

Given new TLDs, such as .zip, tend to have a higher abuse rate than legacy and ccTLDs we suggest that the security research community should continue the healthy debate about the potential risks of the .zip TLD and that internet users continue to be weary of downloading and opening files with a .zip extension or TLD from sources or individuals they may not know.

https://dnsrf.org/blog/the--zip-tld---ripe-for-abuse--but-so-far-so-good-/index.html

Choosing to use this TLD basically just screams ignorance, and should be causing users to question the competence of the person who made that choice.

Not sure if that tone is the best for a healthy debate.

Oh nice! Maybe I should try too

Your family members are on Lemmy?

Happy cake day!

saved posts etc

Saved posts are exportable https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/45915265?scrollToComments=true

Is there any PoC of attacks on Lemmy using .zip TLD ? The instance has been up for 2 years, I never heard anything