It’s shocking to me that I recognize every person on this diagram except for the very center.
It’s shocking to me that I recognize every person on this diagram except for the very center.
Yes, it’s equally as unrealistic as leaving money idle for 532 yrs.
The only point I was making was that multiplying $5,000 a day by so many years is a silly comparison as it ignores the dominating factors to building wealth.
Billionaires shouldn’t exist but also they don’t exist because they stuff X dollars under their mattress every day.
Not really with that amount of time. Suppose you put away $1,000 a year for 532 years, at 3% you still end up with $225 billion.
The deposits are completely dwarfed by the compounding interest. If you only start with $1,000 and add nothing else but let that original $1,000 compound at 4% you’ll have over $1 trillion.
Yeah, I had to go down to 3% for it to even make sense.
But if you made just 3% interest on your money as you deposit $1,825,000 annually, over 532 years, you’d end up having $410 trillion dollars or more than 2,000 bezos.
You know what this reminds me of? Alex Jones repeatedly lying about the Sandy Hook school shooting and having to pay over a billion dollars after his followers repeatedly harassed and threatened those families.
How is this thoroughly debunked lying by Trump and Vance any different?
It cannot tell you since then a human would become aware of this information.
At the same time, you’re forcing it to extract this information. Yet you haven’t told it the timeframe within which to answer.
Obviously, the solution it has come up with to satisfy your request within these constraints is to answer very slowly. So slowly that the answer won’t be revealed until it can be certain that humanity will already be extinct.
Given that it provided us with the first word in 30 min, we should all be very concerned.
You’re famous for being photographed shirtless on a horse. Is that because horses can’t judge you, or is it a new Russian policy for reducing laundry costs?
Can someone provide some context here? Why is he screaming at a coach?
Also side note: why is that even vaguely tolerable behavior for a professional sports player / role model?
0.1mm seems awfully thin for a double edged blade.
It’s also unreasonable to assume they will stack anywhere close to perfectly.
My guess is you’re off by at least a factor of 20.
I was thinking the same, but then realized it’s probably just quiche.
Suburbanite: Child, go open the instacart app on my phone and have some eggs delivered by an underpaid driver for $35.
once the two sets have reached their value
will weigh 100 times less
there should be the same number bills in the sets
The short answer is that none of these statements apply the way you think to infinite sets.
I suspect these are using additional tools to guide the AI beyond a simple prompt. For example the spiraling medieval village was generated with stable diffusion and controlnet.
There are two axes on the periodic table…
You’d have to at least rearrange it so the heaviest elements are at the bottom.
Well that didn’t age well, did it.